Brothers in Law is a recurring series by brothers Akhil and Vikram Amar, with special emphasis on measuring what the Supreme ...

Empirical SCOTUS is a recurring series by Adam Feldman that looks at Supreme Court data, primarily in the form of opinions ...

Each holiday season, as peppermint mochas return to coffee shop menus and mall Santas take their posts, a familiar kind of ...

Civil Rights and Wrongs is a recurring series by Daniel Harawa covering criminal justice and civil rights cases before the ...

Immigration Matters is a recurring series by César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández that analyzes the court’s immigration docket, ...

Please note that SCOTUS Outside Opinions constitute the views of outside contributors and do not necessarily reflect the ...

Nuts and Bolts is a recurring series by Stephen Wermiel providing insights into the mechanics of how the Supreme Court works.

It has been slightly over six weeks since the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the challenge to President Donald Trump’s ...

The Supreme Court on Tuesday left in place a ruling by a federal judge in Chicago that bars the Trump administration from deploying National Guard troops in Illinois. In a […] ...

The Supreme Court on Friday turned down a request from the Trump administration in a dispute over a policy limiting speaking ...

Does the Supreme Court decide its cases based on rank partisanship rather than legal principles? Many scholars and ...

It may be Christmas and Hanukkah season, but I’ve got a Supreme Court ghost story to tell. It comes from Justice Antonin ...